Difference between revisions of "Why Amahara is Not Japan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Maloncanth (talk | contribs) m (Created page with "*Amahara does not have an Emperor - it has an Apostle. *Amahara Shinto is concerned with proselytising and spreading Shinto well beyond the borders of the home islands. *Amahara ...") |
Maloncanth (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Amahara is not Japan. In fact, it is very appropriately categorised as a form of ''NotJapan''. The following are a few reasons why Amahara is similar to but not Japan. | ||
| + | |||
*Amahara does not have an Emperor - it has an Apostle. | *Amahara does not have an Emperor - it has an Apostle. | ||
*Amahara Shinto is concerned with proselytising and spreading Shinto well beyond the borders of the home islands. | *Amahara Shinto is concerned with proselytising and spreading Shinto well beyond the borders of the home islands. | ||
*Amahara Shinto was never conflated with Buddhism as in Japan. | *Amahara Shinto was never conflated with Buddhism as in Japan. | ||
Revision as of 18:18, 8 July 2011
Amahara is not Japan. In fact, it is very appropriately categorised as a form of NotJapan. The following are a few reasons why Amahara is similar to but not Japan.
- Amahara does not have an Emperor - it has an Apostle.
- Amahara Shinto is concerned with proselytising and spreading Shinto well beyond the borders of the home islands.
- Amahara Shinto was never conflated with Buddhism as in Japan.