Second Sphere Suggestion Box

Put any and all your random suggestions here. Please try to avoid one-sentence suggestions unless they're pretty self-evident. A short description of the idea would be nice. Also, please sign the suggestion so I know who to get back to in case I need clarification or expansion.

Possibilities could include

Technologies

NPC worlds

Rules for anything

Fluff (I'll contact you to hash it out in greater detail)

Plot hooks

Political events

Histories

Art

General suggestions

Things to keep in mind

Criticisms or pitfalls

Keep it constructive!

Remember that chances are I can't use everything, so don't be discouraged if your suggestion doesn't get used. I appreciate the help.

---

AI should be cheap but inferior to regular-people, for better use of giant swarms of Raptors and droids and whatnot.

Economics: Economics in Spaaaace

Growth and Savings

Or: You mean you need money to make money? Amazing!

The economy is constantly growing at a slow pace, and as such infrastructure improvements are made quarterly and "immediately" finish. Therefore, growth is done quarterly (whenever new builds must be submitted?) and said infrastructural growth immediately finishes.

Besides for the standard growth categories, there are two others that can be increased by spending-domestic support and population. The latter represents immigration-friendly policies, tax breaks for incoming businesses and their employees, improved government programs to integrate immigrants into society at large, and other similar policies for the most part, although nations with the inclination and will to use bioroid labor can simply start the factories up for another batch.

Domestic support can be increased by government spending as well, although the effects are generally temporary and short-term, used to compensate for crisis situations or simply to stave off impending disaster for just a little longer. This represents propaganda, beating people into a nationalistic fervor, spending a giant pile of money on pork, and other ways to keep the voting bloc happy lest they decide to vote you out of office-or worse yet, vote with Kalashnikovs instead of the ballot box.

Growth and Morale

Or: Bread and Circuses in the 22nd century

Many countries have found that keeping their population well fed and wealthy allows them to act more freely without the risk of significant dissent or revolt. This has not changed at all-poor growth in infrastructure and GDP can and will cause civil unrest, while high growth and the promise of economic prosperity can silence an angry population.

If economic growth does not hit a critical threshold, popular support can and will wane, although subsidies and government action (i.e. bribing the people) can stave off the worst effects, for a period of time. But once bread and circuses are promised, it is not difficult to cause the population to start demanding more, and with an essentially static infrastructure base, this is the way collapsed nations are built.

On the flipside, sustained growth can increase population support, as the promise of prosperity in the near future allows them to forgive the goverment for a lot more than people who aren't seeing their nest eggs and future brighten before their eyes. A nation which has the wealth, research and development infrastructure, and savings rate to sustain high economic growth can ignore its internal turmoil and societal problems for the most part-until it can no longer sustain said growth rates.

Inflation

Or: There are some things posthumans can't solve. This is one of them.

Inflation is an ugly fact of economic growth-as per-capita wealth and income increases, each individual dollar or peso or renminbi becomes worth somewhat less. Similarly, most countries only save small percentages of their GDP, using the rest for purchases, infrastructural improvements, subsidies, and other actions. At the beginning of every year, the saved money a nation possesses in its treasury is decremented by a certain percentage (3%-5%).

In theory this should encourage people to go out and spend their money instead of stockpiling it for no particular reason.

Trade

Or: You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours.

Trade is common for one reason-in general, it makes everyone better off when it happens. Trade based economies are prosperous but generally also vulnerable to disruption, making it a tradeoff between security and prosperity.

To Be Finished

Technology and the Economy

Or: How exactly did we get "A" from Technology?

Technological improvement also spurs economic growth as well as investment. As technology improves, productivity improves, even if the net effects are fairly minor. Therefore, Research Points can be used to improve the economy in place of wealth, representing focusing government research efforts on economic, rather than military, applications and improving prosperity in that fashion.

Galaxy-Wide Economic Events

Or: Help help I'm in a recession and I'm out of money!

However, most countries seek to keep a reserve of currency for a significant reason-economic fluctuations and other contingencies can only be predicted on a fairly rough scale, and must be corrected for. Lacking enough money in case of a galaxy-wide recession (not uncommon in a fairly interconnected economic system) can cause significant popular support hits.

Overcapacity

Or: The care and feeding of your very own Solow model

There are nations which generally have far more infrastructure than their savings rate and population can support. This is rare, because fundamentally this is unstable. A nation with overcapacity loses said infrastructure over time, as money and workforce are stretched too thin to accomodate it. Fundamentally, a nation with overcapacity must invest a significant amount of wealth into maintaining growth or at least stagnation until the population and GDP grow sufficiently to support its infrastructure, as the market is already saturated and the government is essentially the sole party holding it up from collapse.

A nation with infrastructure greater than what its population can support abandons said infrastructure at a rate of (total infrastructure - maximum supportable infrastructure/50 * maximum supportable infrastructure) per quarter. So for example, Davistan has 1250 industry but can only support 250 from population and other factors. Davistan, therefore, loses 8% of its infrastructure per quarter (a -8% growth rate) unless it pays through the nose to maintain its productivity levels.

Furthermore, a nation's cost to subsidize infrastructure it cannot support is increased by a factor of (1 + total infrastructure/maximum supportable infrastructure), rounded down. So Davistan is also paying 5 times as much per unit to keep its infrastructure from decaying. Given that it's losing domestic support as its infrastructure decays, chances are it will be an ex-nation within a few years.