Talk:Battle of Randall Prime

Lokar:

• I'll play variable number of Imperial battlesheeps.

Mal:

• Whatever lets me use Fleet Command

Holle:

• Jardin battlesheep! Variable number. (I figure 4-6 depending on how many people join up on Jardin side, might also be some of the destroyers if nobody takes the poor tincans

100thlurker:
Feedback
Recommend drop AA scores as a passive defense entirely. Anti-missile defense as a function of armament definitely works and works well, and I think it is the proper choice.

• Perhaps certain weapons such as Anti-matter Guns have a lower TN to defend against missiles.

Battle seems to reflect my concerns that the formation rules strongly favor attacks in column and punish firing lines severely. Fixes:

• If line-of-fire passes through *any* friendly ships in formation, rather than every 2 friendly ships, TN is raised.
• Arbitrary formations instead of based purely on map reading.

Frigate ECM buffs are definitely effective.
Increases in direct fire ranges without an increase in movement speeds is potentially a mistake. At low speeds the effect of player skill is massive, see the entire Jardin formation dashing into Anti-matter Gun range.

• Either shrink direct fire brackets back to their original form or extend ship movement.
• Such a heavy AMG armament feels inappropriate - in the rescheming of battleships they should probably have an increased Capital/Heavy Laser armament with only 2-3 points of AMGs as secondaries.

Full offensive leads to eggshell combat with battleships casually foundering in 2-3 turns, which while probably working as intended with NPC combat, may be difficult now that PvP is a likely possibility.

• +Half(round up) weapon pool instead of double?
• Perhaps double weapons Full Offensive should be limited in application, to command checks